It was Meta himself who first told me about the new book on the attack on Mark Zuckerberg, Sheril Sandberg and the apparently bankruptcies of their company. On March 7, a meta public relations person contacted me to ask him if I heard about it The people of carelessness, A company assumed to be released within a few days. I was not no one in the meta had yet read the book, but the CommS section previously destroyed it and issued a statement that the author was “ended” in 2017.
Was my first thought Wow, I have to read this book! And in fact I did it, swallowing it on one night as soon as it was published. I suspect the meta complains. Keeping careless people May become a necessary read. Meta-a company that promotes himself as a free speech avatar-persuaded a referee to silence the author of Sarah Wayne Williams, who was responsible for connecting Meta’s managers with world leaders. The verdict, relying on the NDA, signed after Vienna Williams, calls for the book to be stopped, doing everything in its power to stop its publication and recover all comments “irregular, critical or otherwise harmful” about meta. This is almost the whole book. Vienna Williams, who signed as a whistle with SEC, did not attend the hearing session and does not appear to be respected. As I write this, Keeping careless people It is now the third best -selling book in Amazon.
The referee’s “emergency” ruling was the peak of a fierce campaign against the book that erupted after the company looked at it. Even when I have turned the pages Keeping careless peopleMy inbox was obese with meta dispatches. “His book is a combination of old claims and false accusations about our managers,” the company spokesman says. They describe him as a result of “poor performance and toxic behavior”. They call him a “unhappy activist in an attempt to sell a book”. In the social media, meanwhile, current and former employees sent their views to defend malignant managers.
If this is a very old news, you might ask why Meta is going to nuclearly in Vienna Williams? From one thing, the author was a senior manager in the room, and in the corporate jet, when something happened – and he claims that things were worse than we thought. Yes, the reckless disregard for Meta in Myanmar, where people died in uprising caused by inaccurate information posted on Facebook, and the company has apologized since then. But Vienna Williams’s storytelling paints an image that meta leaders simply do not care about the dangers. While the media wrote about Zuckerberg’s obsession about entering Facebook in China, Vienna Williams is sharing official documents that it indicates that the Meta ordered the Chinese government to recognize face and artificial intelligence, saying that the company’s behavior was so cruel to show the team’s titles. An example: “Zuckerberg will not stop to enter China.” While the blanket statement cannot be trusted in the book, Meta has not rejected all these claims in particular. (In general, when a company tries to reject the charges as “old news”, which is translated into a confirmation.)
However, in the context of what we know about Meta, nothing is shockingly new about the company’s actions and inaccuracies. Keeping careless people It is not a research task, but a memory that the issue of narrative is the disregard for the company’s leaders. Given this personal focus, it is not surprising that Keeping careless peopleThe most memorable moments are not the ethics of ordinary meta companies, but the most common anecdotes of corporate aircraft or in luxury hotels. Despite the great reference F. Scott Fitzgerald title, much of the book is read like a large part of the theme White LotusVienna Williams says that Shryl Sandberg pushed him to share a bed between the bed, which the senior Meta World’s chief of the World Affairs, Joel Caplan called him “cloak” and milled against him while his father danced in a corporate retreat. (This led to a claim of sexual harassment that Meta is now saying “is misleading and unfounded.”
Can He trusts him? Meta calls Wynn-Williams a unreliable narrator and is certainly interested. I tend to think that he is not doing things, but the events in the least light for his subjects and the most desirable light for himself. And although he may not accept it, he is one of the careless people. On his own account, he was Susan Collins of the Facebook policy team, questioning his hands on ethical practices and sometimes protesting – but eventually going through the flow. He says he had been out of the run away for years, but due to serious health problems, he failed to leave the medical job and coverage. Since he was a corporate manager that made millions of dollars in compensation and California includes the conditions for private health insurance, this is not true. He got stuck until he was canned. At that time, according to his own account, he slowly made his efforts because he opposed the policies of his employers.
