On May 16, 2023, Sam Altman appeared under the Senate Judiciary Committee. The title of the session was “monitoring of artificial intelligence”. The meeting was a love, both Altman and the Senators celebrated what Altman was called the “moment of the press” – and acknowledged that the United States needed strong rules to prevent its problems. “We think that governments’ oversight intervention is very important to reduce the risks of models,” he said. The legislators were hanging on every word Altman because he said about how smart laws could allow artificial intelligence – but only in the company’s instructions that both lawmakers and artificial intelligence makers are vital at that moment. Altman was talking about the industry, which widely shared his attitude. The scream of the battle “set us up!”
Two years later, on May 8, Altman returned to another group of senators. Senators and Altman were still singing, but one of the different playlists was coming out. This session was called the “winner of the AI”. In DC, the word “supervision” has declined in its favor, and artificial intelligence discourse is no exception. Ted Cruz, chairman of the Ted Cruise Committee, has argued for a way that the government not only burned innovation but also removes obstacles such as “over -adjustment” to evaluate artificial intelligence models to evaluate risks, or to warn people when interacting with artificial intelligence. Altman got with it. His message was no longer “my arrangement” but “invested in me”. He said that excessive regulation – such as the rules adopted by the EU or a bill in California will be “catastrophic”. “We need space to innovate and move quickly,” he said. He confirmed that safety guards may be necessary, but they needed “reasonable regulations that do not slow us”.
What happened? From one thing, the terrible moment just after all over the chatter, and it turned out that Congress did not intend to move quickly in AI. But the biggest progress is that Donald Trump withdrew the White House and hit the brake brakes with a delicate tone and regulator of the Biden government. Trump’s doctrine of Artificial Intelligence Regulations appear to be closely close to Trump’s supporters, Mark Andersen, who stated in his optimistic technical manifesto that artificial intelligence regulations are literally a kind of murder because “any reduction of artificial intelligence will be a life.” Vice President JD VANCE explicitly expressed these priorities at an international gathering held in Paris in February. “I’m not here … to talk about artificial intelligence safety, which was the title of the conference a few years ago,” he said. “We believe that over -regulating the artificial intelligence sector can eliminate a transformative industry just as it disappears, and we will do our best to encourage pro -artificial development policies.” The government later unveiled an artificial intelligence plan “to strengthen the US position as a power plant and prevent unnecessary requirements for preventing innovation in the private sector”.
Two enemies have emerged in this movement. The first is the European Union, which has adopted a regime that requires transparency and accountability of large artificial intelligence companies. The White House humiliates this approach like those who create artificial intelligence jobs in the United States.
But it is China’s biggest Bogeyman. The landscape of the People’s Republic, which is the best in the US AI race, is so unthinkable that it must abandon the regulations, or with what Altman and Cruise described as “style touch”. Some of these arguments stem from a theory called “hard -to -reach”, indicating that AI models can reach their peak, in which the self -training of a vomiting pot of superconducting superconductors, also known as AGI. “If you get there first, you can’t get you personally,” says former Google CEO Eric Schmidt. But the White House is probably less interested in singing in classical economic competition.
Fear of China’s advance of artificial intelligence is the main cause of the current US policy, damn safety. The party line even protests the individual countries trying to fill in the vacuum of inaccuracy with their laws. Tax Payment Version, Medicaid Cutting Megabill recently approved by parliament contains a mandatory legal deadline in any AI law at the state level For 10 yearsHumanity is like eternity in terms of progress of artificial intelligence. (Experts say that this article does not survive the Senate in the Senate, but it should be noted that almost every republican voted in the parliament.)
